TSXV: MGR
Last: 0.04
Change: -0.01
Vol: 641,376
OTCQB: MGLQF
Last: 0.28
Change: -0.03
Vol: 66,300

News

82 Richmond Street East

Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5C 1P1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Magna Gold Announces Maiden Resource Estimate for the Margarita Silver Project

Toronto, Ontario – April 21, 2022 – Magna Gold Corp. (TSXV: MGR, OTCQB: MGLQF) (“Magna” or the "Company"), is pleased to report the maiden mineral resource estimate (the “Resource”) for the Margarita silver deposit at its 100% owned Margarita Project (the “Margarita Project”) in Chihuahua, Mexico.

Highlights

President and CEO Arturo Bonillas commented; “Delivery of a maiden resource estimate is a huge milestone for the Company. The team delivered this robust resource on schedule and on budget. We have unlocked tremendous value through the drill bit and there is great potential for significant resource growth in the near term. Our exploration program defined a high-grade resource and discovered several parallel structures. We look to add the newly discovered structures in our next resource update and anticipate material increases in the mineral inventory”.  Mr. Bonillas continues, “We are on track to release a PEA in the coming months and will be making a construction decision before the end of 2022.   Based on what we have seen so far I am confident the Margarita Project will generate significant value for our shareholders for years to come”.

Margarita Project Resource Summary April 2022 (75 g/t Ag cut-off)

  Resource Category Margarita Vein Tonnage (Kt) Average Grade (Ag g/t) Metal Content (x1,000 oz)
Total Indicated Margarita VEIN_2 1,075 112.8 3,901
Margarita Vein_HG 779 332.1 8,316

Total

1,854 204.9 12,217
Inferred Margarita VEIN_2 75 100.1 243
Margarita Vein_2S 378 164.0 1,994

Total

454 153.4 2,237

Mineral Resource Notes: 
1.    The effective date for the Margarita Project mineral resource estimate is April 08, 2022.
2.    The  report includes only mineralization that is completely inside Magna’s 100% owned mining concessions boundaries.
3.    The mineral resources are reported based on an underground mining method scenario, assuming a recoverable crown pillar of 15 m, and constrained reasonable underground prospects for economic extraction.
4.    The mineralized envelopes were modelled at a base case cut-off grade of 25.0 g/t Ag for Vein 2 and Vein 2 South and 300.0 g/t Ag for the High-Grade vein. The High-Grade vein is entirely contained within the south side of the Vein 2 envelope. All        modelling work was conducted using Leapfrog Geo Software.
5.    For the purposes of the mineral resource estimate the High-Grade vein resources, while contained within the Vein 2 envelope, are estimated exclusive of the Vein 2 resources.
6.    Grade capping was applied to reduce the influence of outlier samples; 350.0 g/t Ag was used for the Low-Grade envelopes (Vein 2 & Vein 2 South) and 1,000.0 g/t Au was used for the High-Grade vein.
7.    The economic parameters used to define mineral resources is a metal price of US$25.0 per troy ounce silver, an underground mining cost US$20.28/t, a processing cost of US$17.57/t and a G&A cost of US$4.57/t for a total of US$42.42/t mined and processed. The silver recovery was estimated at 78%.
8.    The economic Ag cut-off grade calculated from the economic assumptions is 68.0 g/t Ag, however, Magna decided to report resources at 75.0 g/t Ag given the nature of high-grade continuity of the deposit.
9.    The mineral resource has been categorized in the Indicated category for that portion where 3 or more drillholes are located within 80 m distance along strike and down dip, all remaining blocks remain in the Inferred category.
10.    The mineral resources presented here were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council May 10, 2014.
11.    Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
12.    The mineral resource estimate has been prepared without reference to surface rights or the potential presence of overlying public infrastructure.
13.    Figures may not total due to rounding

 

Sensitivity Report: By zone and grade without reference to Classification (global)

 

Zone Ag_Cut-off Grade Tonnage (Kt) Average Grade (Ag g/t) Metal Content (x1,000 oz) Cumulative Tonnage (Kt) Weighted Average Grade (Ag g/t) Cumulative Metal Content (x1,000 oz)
Margarita VEIN_HG 50 0.2 67.2 0.4 773 331.4 8,235
68 0 0 773 331.5 8,235
75 2 86.9 7 773 331.5 8,235
100 3 119.1 10 770 332.2 8,228
125 11 137.3 49 768 333.0 8,218
150 20 164.5 107 756 335.9 8,169
175 42 189.5 259 736 340.6 8,062
200 135 225.2 976 694 349.8 7,803
250 170 275.1 1,499 559 379.9 6,826
300 389 425.5 5,327 389 425.5 5,327
Total 773 331.4 8,235      
Margarita VEIN_2 50 893 58.2 1,671 2,263 86.7 6,308
68 233 71.4 535 1,370 105.3 4,637
75 572 86.2 1,587 1,137 112.2 4,102
100 293 111.1 1,047 565 138.6 2,515
125 138 136.1 602 271 168.2 1,468
150 60 160.6 311 134 201.1 866
175 26 186.0 157 74 234.3 555
200 29 223.7 206 47 260.8 398
250 14 274.1 122 19 317.4 192
300 5 437.3 70 5 437.3 70
Total 2,263 86.7 6,308      
Margarita Vein_2S 50 21 59.4 40 406 157.0 2,050
68 7 71.6 15 385 162.4 2,010
75 29 89.2 84 378 164.0 1,994
100 47 112.0 170 349 170.3 1,910
125 54 138.4 242 302 179.4 1,740
150 88 162.8 460 247 188.4 1,498
175 94 188.1 565 159 202.5 1,038
200 54 212.3 367 66 222.8 473
250 12 269.6 105 12 269.6 105
300 0 0 0 0
Total 406 157.0 2,050      
*Notes for the Sensitivity Table:
  1. The cut-off grades used in the sensitivity analysis have been reviewed and have been found to meet the test of reasonable prospects of economic extraction.
The sensitivity analysis has been conducted on the global resources prior to classification to illustrate the current potential for each zone at each cut-off grade. This is because the continuity of both the vein and mineralization have been demonstrated.

QA/QC

Drill core and rock samples were shipped to ALS Global in Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico and in North Vancouver, Canada for sample preparation and for analysis at the ALS laboratory in North Vancouver.  The ALS Chihuahua and North Vancouver facilities are ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 17025 certified. Silver and base metals were analyzed using a four-acid digestion with an ICP finish and gold was assayed by 50-gram fire assay with atomic absorption ("AA") finish. Over limit analyses for silver were assayed by fire assay and gravimetric finish. Over limit analysis for lead and zinc were re-assayed using an ore-grade four-acid digestion with AA finish.

Control samples comprising certified reference samples, duplicates and blank samples were systematically inserted into the sample stream and analyzed as part of the Company's quality assurance / quality control protocol.

About Magna Gold Corp.

Magna is a Mexico focused gold/silver production company engaged in acquiring, exploring, developing and operating quality precious metals properties in Mexico. It is committed to advancing its 100% owned flagship San Francisco Mine, the Margarita Project and other highly prospective mineral properties located in Sonora and in Chihuahua. The primary strength of the Company is the team of highly experienced mining professionals with a proven track record of developing properties in Mexico from discovery to production. Magna employs community members and services in its operations.

ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Arturo Bonillas

President and CEO

For further information, please visit the Company’s SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com or the Company’s corporate website at www.magnagoldcorp.com or contact us at telephone +52 (662) 310 0326, email info@magnagoldcorp.com.

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Qualified Person

William J. Lewis (P. Geo.), who works as a Senior Geologist for Micon International Limited and is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has approved the scientific and technical information in this news release.

Cautionary Statements

This News Release includes certain “forward-looking statements” which are not comprised of historical facts. Forward-looking statements include estimates and statements that describe the Company’s future plans, objectives or goals, including words to the effect that the Company or management expects a stated condition or result to occur. Forward-looking statements may be identified by such terms as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “estimates”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, or “plans”. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward-looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s objectives, goals or future plans, exploration results, potential mineralization (including estimates of measured and indicated resources, inferred resources and probable reserves), exploration and mine development plans, production (including gold production expectations and guidance), processing and mining expectations (including statements regarding expansion and advancement of assets) and strip ratio trends and expectations. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital, operating and reclamation costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry,  risks related to the effects of COVID-19 on the Company; and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter